jump to content
In the Network: Media Co-op Dominion   Locals: HalifaxTorontoVancouverMontreal

Convicted by the Media, Sentenced by the Courts

warning: Creating default object from empty value in /var/alternc/html/f/ftm/drupal-6.9/sites/www.dominionpaper.ca/modules/img_assist/img_assist.module on line 1747.
Issue: 77 Section: Media Analysis Geography: Ontario Hamilton Topics: police, poverty

June 17, 2011

Convicted by the Media, Sentenced by the Courts

Supporters of Nicole Kish say she is innocent and the media is guilty

by Eugene Ochs

Nicole Kish’s conviction sparked immediate backlash and a grassroots campaign to advocate for her release. On April 30, supporters carried this banner during Hamilton's march against police brutality. Photo: Ashton Grey

HAMILTON—Nicole Kish feels like she’s “living in a bad John Grisham novel.”

Kish was convicted of second-degree murder on March 1, 2011, and sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole for 12 years. An activist, artist and a singer-songwriter with no criminal record, Kish has maintained her innocence since the 2007 death of Ross Hammond, which occurred after a large street brawl near the Toronto intersection of Queen and Bathurst.

Friends and supporters of Kish argue the media storm around the so-called "panhandler killer" was partially responsible for her unfair trial and wrongful conviction, and they are fighting for her release.

Nicole Kish's little sister, Victoria Bivens, wears a Free Nyki t-shirt. Photo: Christine Bivens

The physical altercation that resulted in one man’s death, first described by Detective Sgt. Gary Giroux—and then reiterated by both local and national media—as being between “street kids” and “jocks,” began when a woman identified as Faith Watts allegedly asked for money from George Dranichak and Ross Hammond. On the stand at the preliminary hearings and at the trial, Dranichak testified that he and Hammond, who died of a stab wound that night, responded to Watts with sexually derogatory remarks, such as telling her to perform sexual acts if she wanted money. While on the stand, Dranichak went on to acknowledge that their persistence had fuelled the confrontation.

Nicole Kish had been walking down Queen Street that night with a large number of people celebrating her 21st birthday. She had been in Toronto only for a day prior to the altercation.

Out of the 20 witnesses to testify at the trial, not one identified Kish or saw anyone stabbed that night. In rendering his verdict, Justice Nordheimer addressed this as being inconsequential, saying, “In this case we are not dealing with direct identification but rather with circumstantial identification.”

Two witnesses did testify to seeing a woman in possession of a knife. Kish’s former co-accused, Faith Watts, testified to having pulled out a knife during the altercation and said she had done so out fear for her life and the life of her boyfriend, who witnesses testify was beaten unconscious. Additionally, a substantial amount of DNA was found on Watts’s clothing. However, Nordheimer attributed the DNA findings as being the “limitations of physical evidence,” and while he acknowledged that the knife belonged to Watts, he goes so far as to suggest the knife may have changed hands three times before its fatal use. Stating his case for conviction, he focused on Kish being stabbed, saying that since Kish had been stabbed, there’s an “irresistible inference” that she must have killed Hammond.

Several surveillance cameras were recording that night; two, however, were inexplicably lost while in police custody: the footage on one was recorded over, and the other was “lost”. The explanation Detective Giroux had provided to the courts was that the video was placed in the evidence box but by the time it came into his possession, the video was simply no longer there. Citing previous case law (R. v. La), Nordhiemer attributed the loss of that video to the “frailties of human nature.”

“It’s dumbfounding,” says Kish via telephone from the women’s prison in Kitchener, Ontario. Reflecting on her conviction and the lack of evidence to substantiate it, she emphasizes that she is not alone, saying, “To one end, I understand oppression. I understand humanity’s long history of abuse; I understand I am not the first, nor will I be the last, to be convicted of a crime I did not commit. I just don't understand why.”

“This was not a fair and impartial trial, but a politically-motivated attempt to vilify a young activist, justify draconian ‘Safe Streets’ legislation and further criminalize and marginalize youth and poor people,” says Kevin MacKay, a Professor at Mohawk College and the Executive Director of the Sky Dragon Community Development Centre in Hamilton. MacKay first met Kish when she asked if she could use the centre as a drop off location for Books to Bars, a non-profit organization she founded in Southern Ontario which donates reading and educational material to over a dozen correctional facilities. Describing Kish as being “hard-working and passionate,” MacKay grew to know her through their joint organizing of the G20 Hamilton Primer and her stage performances at the Sky Dragon. MacKay describes Kish’s trial as revealing “a desire on behalf of the police to force a conviction against massive contrary evidence,” in order to obtain the conviction that, from the very beginning, the Toronto Police had promised to the media and the public.

Furthermore, MacKay blames the mainstream media for showing an “equally disturbing level of bias and corruption” in what he describes as “erroneous reports” such as the Toronto Sun claiming Kish was identified at trial as having the knife clenched in her mouth (which she wasn’t), or the media labeling her “the panhandler killer” despite the fact that no evidence indicated that Kish had been panhandling.

Many of Kish’s supporters share this criticism of the media. Within hours of the altercation, the case was highly publicized as the “panhandler stabbing,” causing an extraordinary amount of public outcry against the city’s perceived leniency towards panhandling and the homeless. Top city and provincial officials as well as columnists and talk show hosts weighed in on the incident, calling for panhandling to be made illegal in the city. The media storm began before much was known about the case except what was included in press releases from the Toronto Police, which Kish’s mother Christine Bivens said the media treated “as gospel.”

“One of the ways they [the media] shaped the case [is that] Nicole was always referred to as the panhandler despite the fact there was absolutely no testimony that she was a panhandler,” said Bivens. “Contrast this with the portrayal of George Dranichak, purveyor of porn, and his business associate Ross Hammond, whom the media referred to as internet marketers.”

George Dranichak is an owner of a multi-level porn marketing company, which manages such sites as Uncaged Marketing and Guerrilla Traffic. Also, it came to light during the trial that while attending school in Kentucky, Dranichak settled out of court after violently assaulting an individual after forcing his way into the person's dorm. Being someone who runs a pornography marketing company and has a history of violence carries entirely different implications than being an “internet marketer,” and might have provided a very different narrative to the public discourse. However, these elements of Dranichak’s character were left out of media coverage.

When Kish was out on bail she was under a stringent publication ban that prohibited her and her family from speaking publicly about the case. Her grandmother Val Lewis says the ban affected the outcome of the case. She feels this way especially in regards to Kish’s character, saying that Kish “would fight for a cause up to but excluding violence. Violence has never been a part of her makeup. But drawing attention to wrongs always has.”

Despite the media coverage, Kish’s conviction sparked immediate backlash and a grassroots campaign to advocate for her release. Weeks after her conviction, supporters organized a show to raise awareness and funds for her appeal. They held a rally outside the courthouse immediately following Kish’s sentencing on April 4, 2011, which heard the courtroom erupt in chants of “Free Nyki!”

When asked what’s next for the Free Nyki Campaign, Bivens believes that the courts will “overturn Nicole’s conviction if [they find] it wasn’t properly based on points of law.” If this happens, it will make Kish eligible for bail pending a second trial, which is a priority for Kish’s family and supporters.

Eugene is a writer and activist living in Hamilton Ontario. He came to know Nicole Kish through both their participation in the arts and in community organizing. He currently supports the campaign to free Nyki.

Own your media. Support the Dominion. Join the Media Co-op today.

Comments

Nicole Kish

Having followed this court case throughout various areas of media......it appears many many articles have been slanted.
Having no emotional bias in this trial, having been a family member of one brutally murdered years ago, I have seen firsthand the antics of media/ATTORNEYS/family members.
Is no doubt both families lost a loved one on that dreadful night. Ms Kishs 21 Bday at that. Obviously not one person can state who had the knife in what persons hand.
Ms Kish put her good faith in her attorney and her decision was to be judged by JUDGE alone. That in itself seems to be the strongest basis of the family of Ms Kish quest for justice. The testimony of one Ms Faith Watts is extremely relevant and somewhat been suppressed by the family that wants the public to support Ms Kish in her quest for her *freedom* from being wrongly convicted.
Contacting cbc I have done, requesting a indepth investigation. On behalf of the family as they requested.
Having a Supreme Court panel of Judges reverse a sitting Judges verdict is near impossible. Having done same, I expect they will not overturn on conditions the family of Ms Kish has supplied to the public.
I am sure MsKish would take back that whole night entirely if she could. I am certain Mr Hammonds family will never wake a day and not feel the loss they have endured.
This is beyond a persons comprehension unless you have sat in ones shoes.
It is a lengthy , expensive process, emotionally and physically draining to both families. Ms Kish now no doubt realizes the truth speaks for itself. She wishes I am sure she had of taken the stand/choosen a jury of her *peers*.
But she didnt! Mr Hammonds family suffers a loss unspeakable.
The People Have Spoken.
LRS

When Innocent People Get Convicted of Murder

Innocent people who get convicted of murder often end up serving longer sentences than those who are actually guilty (as opposed to "guilty") of the crime they are alleged to have committed. This is because part of a prisoner's "rehabilitation" is "taking responsibly" for the crime that put them in jail in the first place, apologizing to the victim's family and making other acts of contrition.

Prisoners who maintain their innocence thus get caught in a catch 22: as far as the "justice system" (sic) is concerned, such prisoners have been lawfully convicted and maintaining their innocence (even if they actually are) is considered proof that they are not "rehabilitated" and must spend more time in jail, which in Kish's case could be the rest of her life.

I just wonder how many wrongfully convicted people have been forced to confess to crimes they did not commit as the cost of getting out of jail.

I wish Nicole, her family and friends all the best in dealing with this injustice.

Excellent article. I'm not

Excellent article. I'm not from that area so I was unaware of her case. This type of reporting is necessary for transparency, to allow us to see how people get railroaded and because of her political activism as well. Being charged with murder is heavy. If this woman is unable to appeal her case, (such as the Ojibway man John Moore who spent over 10 years for a murder he didn't commit and over 20 years since trying to clear his name) this will mean that this woman will be living with a Life Sentence. So even if she is released back into the outside community after 12 or plus years, she'll be on parole for Life... and you don't have to do crimes to get pulled back inside. Lack of Transparency is all it takes... not telling your parole officer who you're sleeping with, or what you did on Friday night, if they ask.... This is totally messed up!! My heart goes out to her, but she needs more than that. This could be you, this could be me.

Convicted by the Media

Read more about Judge Nordheimer here. He threw out this case which involved 6 Police Drug Squad officers. His decision was overturned on appeal. The cops are back in court facing the charges of Beating up drug dealers and stealing their money. Shaking down bar owners for protection money. Extortion, obstructing justice, assault, theft, perjury, corrupt practices.
Someone needs to investigate Judge Nordheimer.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/torontopolice/

JUST-US?

Grateful for this info.

convicted by the media

Our system is biased and heavy handed. We must stand up to it in order to create accountabilty, awareness and change. Support all fighting for change. ''A great article- hope there is a follow up soon.

Advertisement

Want to receive an email notice when a new issue is online? Click here

The Dominion is a monthly paper published by an incipient network of independent journalists in Canada. It aims to provide accurate, critical coverage that is accountable to its readers and the subjects it tackles. Taking its name from Canada's official status as both a colony and a colonial force, the Dominion examines politics, culture and daily life with a view to understanding the exercise of power.

»Where to buy the Dominion

User login