<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.dominionpaper.ca"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>The Dominion - copyleft</title>
 <link>http://www.dominionpaper.ca/taxonomy/term/2388/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Feds launch six sizzling weeks of copyright talks, forget to redesign website</title>
 <link>http://www.dominionpaper.ca/weblogs/dawn/2799</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-blog-entry-image&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;div class=&quot;filefield-file&quot;&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;filefield-icon field-icon-image-png&quot;  alt=&quot;image/png icon&quot; src=&quot;http://www.dominionpaper.ca/sites/all/modules/filefield/icons/image-x-generic.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dominionpaper.ca/files/weblogs-img/Picture%207.png&quot; type=&quot;image/png; length=61866&quot;&gt;Picture 7.png&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I just posted an article about yesterday&#039;s launch of the federal government&#039;s copyright consultations at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://vancouver.mediacoop.ca/story/1759&quot;&gt;Vancouver Media Cooperative&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Something that didn&#039;t quite fit into the story, but that keeps nagging at me, is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://copyright.econsultation.ca&quot;&gt;website&lt;/a&gt; that the feds launched yesterday. The site &lt;em&gt;supposedly&lt;/em&gt; has the intention of promoting this process.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I say&lt;em&gt; supposedly &lt;/em&gt;for a number of reasons: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;•the site itself is horrid to look at, harking back to the dying days of Web 1.0.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;•the site does not appear to be linked to or from any other Government of Canada pages, including the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consultingcanadians.gc.ca/tt.jspx?lang=eng&amp;amp;tp=c&quot;&gt;Consulting with Canadians&lt;/a&gt; page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;•the site was launched yesterday, so existing traffic is nil. Though it does have a date stamp on the bottom which reads &lt;em&gt;Date Modified: 2007-11-14&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;•the site lacks essential details, and yesterday&#039;s press release was posted as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://copyright.econsultation.ca/topics-sujets/show-montrer/23&quot;&gt;blog entry&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ministers responsible (Tony Clement/Industry, James Moore/Heritage) seem to think that opening a &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/copyrightcanada&quot;&gt;Twitter account&lt;/a&gt; is enough to propel the consultations into the wider consciouness. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I asked them about this at yesterday&#039;s press conference in Vancouver, Clement responded that he hoped the consultation process would &quot;go viral.&quot; Guess he hasn&#039;t seen the website.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For what it&#039;s worth, the second round table is currently under way in Calgary. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dominionpaper.ca/weblogs/dawn/2799&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.dominionpaper.ca/weblogs/dawn/2799#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.dominionpaper.ca/topics/copyleft">copyleft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.dominionpaper.ca/topics/copyright_0">copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.dominionpaper.ca/geography/canada">Canada</category>
 <category domain="http://www.dominionpaper.ca/place/vancouver">Vancouver</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>dawn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2799 at http://www.dominionpaper.ca</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
