<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.dominionpaper.ca"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>The Dominion - social networking</title>
 <link>http://www.dominionpaper.ca/taxonomy/term/1203/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Wal-Mart&#039;s Facebook Ghost Signals Need for Ad Policy</title>
 <link>http://www.dominionpaper.ca/weblogs/rob_maguire/1488</link>
 <description>&lt;div class=&quot;field field-type-filefield field-field-blog-entry-image&quot;&gt;
    &lt;div class=&quot;field-items&quot;&gt;
            &lt;div class=&quot;field-item odd&quot;&gt;
                    &lt;div class=&quot;filefield-file&quot;&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;filefield-icon field-icon-image-jpeg&quot;  alt=&quot;image/jpeg icon&quot; src=&quot;http://www.dominionpaper.ca/sites/all/modules/filefield/icons/image-x-generic.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dominionpaper.ca/files/weblogs-img/walmartghost.jpg&quot; type=&quot;image/jpeg; length=16199&quot;&gt;walmartghost.jpg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;        &lt;/div&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tightly trapped in cellophane, a pixelated ghost looks more like a desperate prisoner than a spooky sweet. In the latest move of their Facebook marketing strategy, Wal-Mart has branded a digital ghost cookie with their logo, creating a free &quot;gift&quot; that Facebook users may send to their friends.  Clicking the cookie brings you to Wal-Mart&#039;s halloween website.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unlike the usual crop of virtual gifts available to users of the social network, the Wal-Mart ghost screams of crass marketing, and critics are skeptical of whether this approach will earn the beast of Bentonville any dividends. The e-commerce site Get Elastic has gone so far as to call the ghost a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.getelastic.com/walmart-facebook-strategy/&quot;&gt;terrible social media marketing tactic&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, arguing that Facebook users &quot;know intrusive advertising when they see it.&quot;  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Among the reactions to the branded gift, however, is little discussion on whether Facebook should be accepting advertising from Wal-Mart in the first place, whose long standing record of human rights violations led the Norwegian government to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aftenposten.no/english/business/article1341741.ece&quot;&gt;completely divest from the company&lt;/a&gt; earlier this year. Aside from a predictable piece by &lt;A href=&quot;http://walmartwatch.com/blog/archives/the_ghost_of_wal_mart_haunting_towns_and_an_online_network_near_you/&quot;&gt;Wal-Mart Watch&lt;/a&gt;, much of the debate related to the ethical issues at stake is taking place on Facebook itself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dominionpaper.ca/weblogs/rob_maguire/1488&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.dominionpaper.ca/weblogs/rob_maguire/1488#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.dominionpaper.ca/topics/advertising">advertising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.dominionpaper.ca/topics/ethics">ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.dominionpaper.ca/topics/facebook">Facebook</category>
 <category domain="http://www.dominionpaper.ca/topics/social_networking">social networking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.dominionpaper.ca/topics/wal_mart">Wal-Mart</category>
 <category domain="http://www.dominionpaper.ca/topics/web_2_0">Web 2.0</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rob Maguire</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1488 at http://www.dominionpaper.ca</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
